Preşedinte profesionist

Citesc, cuminte şi fără mari speranţe (în filosofie e o calitate a defectului), o postare din New York Times, Was Wittgenstein Right? semnată de  Paul Horwich:

“The singular achievement of the controversial early 20th century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein was to have discerned the true nature of Western philosophy — what is special about its problems, where they come from, how they should and should not be addressed, and what can and cannot be accomplished by grappling with them. The uniquely insightful answers provided to these meta-questions are what give his treatments of specific issues within the subject — concerning language, experience, knowledge, mathematics, art and religion among them — a power of illumination that cannot be found in the work of others.
Admittedly, few would agree with this rosy assessment — certainly not many professional philosophers.”

Şi frânez îngrijorat …
Cum adică “professional philosopher” ???
Las asta şi dau să rup zăplazul anxietăţii …
Dacă ochiul curţii îi sugerează, graţios şi igienic,  chiriaşului de la Cotroceni că îndeplineşte cu asupra (dedesubtului) de măsură titlul bietei mele postări ?